Converting from One Metric Unit to Another
practice problems are at the bottom of
Skills you need to do this include:
1) memorize the metric prefixes names and symbols
2) determine which of two prefixes represents a larger amount
3) determine the exponential "distance" between two prefixes
4) significant figure rules
5) scientific notation
Here are two typical metric conversion problems:
1) Convert 2.50 mg to picograms.
2) Convert 0.080 cm to km.
A slightly more complex one is:
Convert the speed of light (3.00 x 108 m/sec) to km/year.
The key skill in solving these problems is to construct a conversion
factor. This conversion factor will make the old unit go away (micrograms and
km in the top two examples) and create the new unit (pm and cm) in its place.
Along with this change, there will be a change in the value of the number.
Let's focus on the first example: Convert 2.50 mg
STEP ONE: Write the value (and its unit) from the problem, then in
order write: 1) a multiplication sign, 2) a fraction bar, 3) an equals sign,
and 4) the unit in the answer. Put a gap between 3 and 4. All that looks like
The fraction bar will have the conversion factor. There will be a number
and a unit in the numerator and the denominator.
STEP TWO: Write the unit from the problem in the denominator of the
conversion factor, like this:
STEP THREE: Write the unit expected in the answer in the numerator
of the conversion factor.
STEP FOUR: Examine the two prefixes in the conversion factor. In
front of the LARGER one, put a one.
There is a reason for this. I'll get to it in a second.
STEP FIVE: Determine the absolute distance between the two prefixes
in the conversion unit. Write it as a positive exponent in front of the other
Now, multiply and put into proper scientific notation format. Don't forget
to write the new unit. Sometimes, the exponential number is in the
denominator. You must move it to the numerator and when you do so, remember to
change the sign. Also, DO NOT move the unit with it. That unit has been
cancelled and is no longer there.
Here are all five steps for the second example, put into one image:
Note that the old unit cancels, since it appears in the numerator and
denominator of two parts of a multiplication problem.
Why a one in front of the larger unit? I believe it is easier to visualize
how many small parts make up one bigger part, like 1000 m make up one km. Going
the other way, visualizing what part a larger unit is of one smaller unit, is
possible, but requires more sophistication. For example, how many meters are in
one nanometer? The answer is 0.000000001 or 10¯9. You may be able to
handle the conversion and that is just fine. I'm just trying to make it simple.
What I have been discussing above is sometimes called a "unitary rate."
Unitary in this case simply means the number one. I have created a system above
where the one can be in either the numerator or denominator of the conversion
unit. You may have a teacher that forces the one to be only in the denominator.
What that means is that you will have to decide if you are going from a large
unit to a small unit (making the numerator exponent positive) or going from a
small one to a large one (making the numerator unit negative).
I think my way is better.
1) If you do the conversion correctly, the numerical part and the unit will
go in opposite directions. If the unit goes from smaller (mm) to larger (km),
then the numerical part goes from larger to smaller. There will never be a
correct case where number and unit both go larger or both go smaller.
2) A common mistake is to put the one in front of the SMALLER unit. This
results in a wrong answer. Put the one in front of the LARGER unit.
work these out on paper, check answers later!
1. 0.75 kg to milligrams
2. 1500 millimeters to km
3. 2390 g to kg
4. 0.52 km to meters
5. 65 kg to g
6. 750 micrograms to g
7. 0.25 megameters to cm
8. 23.8 fg to kg (you don't need to memorize femto, but look it
up in the text)
9. 2.77 kg to mg
10. 2.90 cm to terameters (you don't need to memorize tera,
but look it up in the text)
11. 45.6 microliters to megaliters
12. 1.08 kg to mg
13. 9.57 x 10¯8 mm to nanometers
14. 2.00 L to mL
15. 35.28 mL to L
Thanks to John L. Park for a great source.